Cover of Still Missing by Chevy Stevens

Still Missing

2,466-word summary 11 min read 342 pages in the book

First published
2010
Publisher
St. Martin's Press
Pages
342
ISBN
9780312595678
Reading options
What's inside (10 sections)
  1. The last open house
  2. Two stories in one cover
  3. The rules of the cabin
  4. A man who reads
  5. The baby and the axe
  6. Living in the wreckage
  7. The trail turns inward
  8. What works and what does not
  9. Key takeaways
  10. FAQ

I went into Still Missing expecting the ordinary abduction thriller, the kind where a detective gathers clues in a tidy order and the truth arrives neat at the end. What I found instead were two narratives braided together: a therapy transcript in the voice of a woman talking about the worst year of her life without ever quite looking at it, and a police investigation crawling along beside her in the present. It is graphic in ways that are hard to wash off. It made me stop twice and walk away from the room. It is also better made than its reputation suggests.

St. Martin's Press published the novel in 2010. The first US edition runs 342 pages and carries the ISBN 9780312595678, and the British edition came from Sphere that December. The publisher's line calls it "a shocking, visceral, brutal and beautifully crafted novel about surviving the unsurvivable, and living to bear witness," which is accurate and also a warning. Chevy Stevens was a working realtor on Vancouver Island when she wrote it and left the job to do so. The book reached the New York Times bestseller list and won the 2011 International Thriller Writers Award for Best First Novel.

The last open house

Annie O'Sullivan is thirty-two and a realtor in Clayton Falls, a town on Vancouver Island small enough that a hundred unit condo development is the kind of thing you mention in a local paper. On the first Sunday morning in August she is hosting an open house for a German couple whose wife has baked Bavarian chocolate cake. She has been chasing a waterfront development deal that would transform her career. Her boyfriend Luke is bringing dinner over from his Italian restaurant. Her mother has rung to ask whether she can drop off the cappuccino maker. It is an ordinary, faintly irritating afternoon, and Annie narrates it with the running commentary of someone who has decided that being funny is a form of armour.

Then a man arrives in a van while she is loading the last sign into her trunk. He is friendly, he wants to see the house, and he calls himself David. He gets a gun into her back and walks her out. The open house signs have already been taken down and put in his van, which Annie understands immediately: none of this was spontaneous, and the man has been watching her for long enough to know her afternoon.

She wakes in a fortified log cabin in the mountains above the coast. Every drawer and cabinet is locked. Every weapon has been removed or bolted down. She cannot see out of the windows and cannot tell whether it is day or night. The man she will not call by his name becomes The Freak, and the naming is the first thing she manages to keep.

Two stories in one cover

The structure is the book's best idea. The chapters are headed Session One, Session Two, and so on, and each one opens in a therapist's office with Annie talking to a woman she calls Doc, the first name on the therapist's door being Nadine. She sets the terms herself: no questions, and she will tell the story in her own order. From there the chapter falls back into the cabin, and a second narrative runs in parallel: her life after the escape and the hunt for her captor.

Two worlds, two clocks, the same woman at the center of both. The reader knows from the first page that Annie survives, so the suspense is not whether she gets out. It is what she becomes in there, and what she can survive on the outside.

The rules of the cabin

The Freak's control is bureaucratic before it is violent. Meals at set times. Bathroom breaks on a schedule. Chores assigned. Nightly baths during which he shaves her body. Every word she says and the tone of it comes up for approval. He has a routine the way other men have hobbies, and the routine is the whole mechanism of his power.

The physical cruelty is present and Stevens does not soften it. The arithmetic around it disturbed me more. Annie works out early that he cannot sustain himself if she gives him nothing, so she tries faking arousal, which makes him angrier because he can tell the difference. Left alone for five days with no food, she studies him the way she would study a lock, and when he comes back she gives him the one thing he actually wants, which is genuine terror. The scene is written plainly and it is hard to sit with.

She learns his rules and then learns to live inside them, which is the part that stayed with me. After a while she is not enduring captivity so much as running a household, one where the worst decisions are made by someone else and the only currency she has is compliance. Stevens has clearly done work on this, and it shows in the small mechanics: the locked drawers, the scheduled bathroom, the tone of voice required for a safe sentence.

A man who reads

Inside the cabin Annie becomes a reader of The Freak, in the plain sense that she studies him, and in the other sense too. He is not a monster lifted from a genre. He is articulate, he has read the same books she has, and during the reading hour he argues about them with real feeling. Now and then he says something that is simply true, and Annie finds him interesting, which is the horror of the arrangement. She is ashamed of finding him interesting.

He also tells her about his childhood. His adoptive mother, Juliet, abused him from early on and made him shave his body. He killed his adoptive father by luring him to an old mine. He watched Juliet die of ovarian cancer. Annie ends up carrying compassion for a man who has done nothing but hurt her, and she understands exactly how it was arranged.

Then there is the duck. A wild mallard at the river that Annie feeds when he finally allows her outside to work the garden. The Freak shoots it and makes her cook it and eat it. It is a small, specific cruelty, and it does more to define the power in that cabin than the set-piece violence does. A freedom gets turned into a punishment, and the reader sees the whole arrangement in one image.

The baby and the axe

Annie is pregnant within weeks of her arrival. She gives birth in the spring, out in the garden, largely on her own, while the Freak panics and leaves her to it. The baby is a girl. Annie whispers a name into the child's ear and keeps it to herself. The Freak names her Juliet, after his mother, and becomes possessive and strange about her.

Then the baby falls ill. He refuses to get her to a doctor. She dies, and he carries the body away and will not say where he put it. Annie is left with the question of whether she could have saved her daughter, and she will not let herself off the hook for the answer.

About a week later he tells her he wants her pregnant again immediately. He is chopping wood with his back to her, and the axe is within reach. She buries it in his skull.

It is the least convincing beat in the book, and more than one reader has said so. The Freak has been so careful for so long that the axe arrives without being prepared for, and readers who like their violence with a plan feel cheated. The impulse is right and the mechanics are not. It is also the moment the novel changes genre on you, because after this Annie is no longer trapped. She is running.

She finds the van parked on a logging road, reconnects the battery cable, drives down to a small town, and walks into a police station. Staff Sergeant Gary Kincade takes over the case. He is calm, unhurried, and he treats her as a witness rather than a suspect, which is the first thing that goes right for her in a year.

Living in the wreckage

The second narrative is the one I did not expect to care about as much. Annie spends a couple of weeks in hospital and then goes back to her mother's house, because it is the only home she has left. Her golden retriever Emma was left in the woman's care for the whole year and neglected. Luke wants her back and cannot reach her. Her best friend Christina tries and gets pushed away. The first weeks back she sleeps in a closet. She puts cans in front of the doors, keeps a knife under the bed and pepper spray on the nightstand, and cannot eat unless it is time.

She gets better in small specific increments. She sleeps in her bed. She eats on her own schedule. She runs with Emma again. She does the bookkeeping for Luke's restaurant. Her mother is a drinker whose feud with her own sister, Annie's aunt Val, runs through the book as background noise, and whose attention has always felt like a small injury. Nobody in the story says this out loud, which is part of why it hurts.

The therapy sessions are where Annie is most honest, and the doctor mostly stays quiet, which is its own kind of commentary. What the sessions show is the cost of talking. Annie has to find words for things she had agreed to stop having, and the novel keeps asking whether finding the words changes anything.

I was never going to be okay, or safe.

She says that to the cops who keep telling her she is safe now.

The trail turns inward

Then the case starts to move. Someone breaks into Annie's house and takes nothing. Weeks later a masked man lunges at her from a white van while she is out running, and she and Emma fight him off. Gary's team pulls a file and gets a man with a record, someone Annie can pick out of a lineup. Then a fact turns the whole case over: the photograph The Freak carried of Annie came from inside Annie's own house, which means someone she let in had been watching her for months.

The investigation narrows away from the cabin and inward, toward the people around her. Gary is careful and slow. Annie is not careful and not slow. She goes behind his back, follows the thread herself, and the last movement of the book puts her in a room with the person who paid for her captivity, listening to that person explain, at some length, why it was supposed to be a small thing that went wrong.

What she takes out of that room is not comfort. The year in the cabin was never about her. It was about money, attention, and a family already coming apart, and she was a means to an end. The police make arrests. Annie learns who is responsible and finds that the knowledge does not restore anything, it just relocates the damage.

In the last session she agrees to sell her story to a film producer and says she will use the money for art school in the Rocky Mountains. She has a hard, ugly scene with Christina, who admits her own marriage is failing and that she slept with Luke once during the year Annie was gone, and then the two of them work their way back to each other. And at the very end Annie finally says the name she has been keeping, the secret name she whispered into her daughter's ear that first morning in the garden. It is Hope.

What works and what does not

What works is the architecture. Two timelines, one voice, and a structure that lets the horror and the paperwork share a page. What works is Annie's voice, which is funny, foul-mouthed, perceptive and constantly self-protective, and which Stevens sustains for three hundred pages without letting it turn into a performance. What works is the captor, who is a genuinely well drawn monster: vivid, articulate, and frightening because his reasons make a terrible kind of sense.

The geography does the work too. Clayton Falls and the mountains above it are drawn from a real place, and the cabin feels less like a set than a place a man could actually bolt down.

Then there is what does not work. The captivity material is graphic, and it is graphic on purpose. One reviewer complained about gratuitous detail in the assault and dead baby scenes and called the book voyeuristic, and other reviewers on thriller forums asked whether it reads as a textbook for the people it depicts. It is not a textbook. It is also not shy. Know that before you start.

The ending divides readers, and honestly it should. Some think the final movement cheapens everything before it, that a book about surviving unspeakable abuse gets turned into a family melodrama, with the plotting visibly rushed on the way to the reveal. Others think the honesty of the framing is the entire point, that a survivor's testimony cannot be neat without being false, and that a tidier ending would betray the story. Both readings are defensible. Where you land will tell you what you think novels are for.

The therapy device draws the same split. One reviewer described the novel as a book about therapy in which almost no therapy happens, since Annie reports enormous feeling without ever performing it, and the doctor barely speaks. That bothered me less than it bothered them, but the device does lean on an improbable amount of silence.

Who it is for: readers who want the damage and the case in the same book, who want a story about what happens after the rescue instead of during it, and who will sit with a lot of unpleasant material on purpose. It is not for readers who want a light thriller, and it is not for readers who want the mystery solved tidily.

I have not reread it and do not know that I would. What stayed with me was not the twist but a woman arranging cans in front of her doors so that nothing can get in while she sleeps, and then one morning putting the cans away because she has decided she can keep the doors shut herself. That is the part of the book I would hand to anybody who wants to know what surviving actually feels like, minute by minute, instead of as a metaphor.

FAQ

Is Still Missing too graphic for me?

It is violent. Stevens writes assault, starvation and the death of a baby in detail, and several reviewers called the captivity material excessive. Readers sensitive to sexual violence should know that before starting.

Does the book explain who abducted Annie?

Yes. The police identify her captor, and the final movement of the novel reveals who paid for the abduction. The answer lands very late, so read the whole thing before deciding whether it works.

Is Still Missing part of a series?

No, it is a standalone novel. Chevy Stevens has written several related thrillers since, including Never Knowing and Those Girls, but they are separate stories with their own characters.